3 ms·
I wonder is it somewhat misleading using 35% instead of 8% a year over 4 years. And then them asking 9% a year over 4 years again. After all that is just 1% di
by Ekaros 2y ago
I wonder is it somewhat misleading using 35% instead of 8% a year over 4 years. And then them asking 9% a year over 4 years again.
After all that is just 1% difference. And put to those term, doesn't seem that big considering the felt inflation rates in various goods...
- dv_dt 2y agoAlso considering that they gave concessions to save the company in their last agreement and were likely below inflation for that previous period.
- class3shock 2y agoI would say it's extremely misleading. If a friend told you they got a 35% pay raise at work, wouldn't you assume it was instantaneous / for that year? I can't help but think people will read this and think "Those workers won't take a 35% pay raise? They are so greedy!".
- consteval 2y agoMedia? Subtly pushing anti-union propaganda? Oh, say it ain't so!