2 ms·
Yeah, that's cool. But it's not automation. GP's point is that it will be really hard to take the specialist out of this process, mainly because of regulator
by moralestapia 2y ago
Yeah, that's cool.
But it's not automation.
GP's point is that it will be really hard to take the specialist out of this process, mainly because of regulatory issues.
- alephnerd 2y agoThe point is, if you can substitute even 30-50% of the headcount used in initial diagnostics and analysis, you're profit margins grow exponentially. The customers for these kinds of Radiology Agents are the teleradiology and clinical labwork companies, as well as MSOs and Health Groups looking to cut outside spend by bringing some subset back in-house. 100% automation is unrealistic for a generation, but 30-50% of teleradiology and clinical labwork headcount being replaced by CV applications is absolutely realistic. A lot of players that entered the telemedicine segment during the COVID pandemic and lockdown have begun the pivot into this space, as well as the new-gen MSOs as well as legacy telemedicine organizations (eg. Apollo, Fortis). (Also, why are you getting downvoted? You brought up a valid point of contention)
- moralestapia 2y agoThat's true. You may always need to keep one or two guys in there but they will be able to do 20x more with the same effort. Definitely plausible.