2 ms·
A better argument against chicken breast is that the commercial chickens have been selectively bred, fed, and treated with not-found-in-nature medicines to the
by humanrebar 2y ago
A better argument against chicken breast is that the commercial chickens have been selectively bred, fed, and treated with not-found-in-nature medicines to the point that they don't resemble a "natural" ingredient anymore. This would be in contrast to wild poultry like wild duck, goose, turkey, pheasant, squab, etc.
- watwut 2y agoThe same goes for vegetables and fruits. What we eat has nothing to do with what would you find in the nature.
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y agoLet's not go crazy here. There are wild apples, wild plums, wild grapes, and metric tonnes of wild raspberries growing on my property. They all taste more or less like the supermarket variety. The main difference is that they are noticeably smaller. The black raspberries in particular do taste much better though and are roughly the same size as store-bought. But saying that they have nothing to do with what's commercially available is a cheap shot.
- strken 2y agoWhy would this be the case? What quantifiable difference is there in health outcomes between people who eat one or the other?