You can write nifs that way but it seems like a pain in the ass https://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/erts/erl_nif#enif_schedule_nif https://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/

You can write nifs that way but it seems like a pain in the ass https://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/erts/erl_nif#enif_schedule_nif https://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/erts/erl_nif#enif_schedule_n... After all, many of the BIFs have been replaced internally by NIFs And there's this, which would scare me: https://erlang.org/documentation/doc-15.0-rc3/erts-15.0/doc/html/automaticyieldingofccode.html#introduction https://erlang.org/documentation/doc-15.0-rc3/erts-15.0/doc/...