3 ms·
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41893994 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41893994
by abathur 2y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41893994 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41893994
- Capricorn2481 2y agoSounds like this is what they open sourced? So I don't really see the issue.
- ValentineC 2y agoIt was "source available", but licensed under their proprietary Bitwarden licence and not GPLv3.
- Capricorn2481 2y agoWhat I mean is the problem is remedied now and was likely not the big deal people thought it was. Sounds like they packaged something into the software forgetting it was under a different license and quickly relicensed it. But this thread is framing it like they burned a bridge.