4 ms·
It is definitely more performant in my experience. Occasional hiccups happen as well, but way less than with VS. Please note my experience with VS 22 is a bit d
by muhbaasu 2y ago
It is definitely more performant in my experience. Occasional hiccups happen as well, but way less than with VS. Please note my experience with VS 22 is a bit dated because I moved to Rider a few versions ago (probably 17.8 or 17.9). Additionally, I haven't really used VS without the ReSharper plugin extensively so that's what I can compare Rider to.
Regarding your points:
> MAUI
No personal experience yet unfortunately on my part
> Code completion
At least on par, basically ReSharper with a few extras. Navigation and refactoring is great and comprehensive.
> IIS
Also no personal experience
> Debugging
Great debugger IMHO. Matches VS, predictive debugging is nice (deemphasizes branches it knows won't run), breakpoint conditions are great (only break on a certain thread, after another breakpoint had been hit, after n hits, ...), shows return values in the watch list automatically, etc.
> Look & feel
Probably personal preference: I prefer its more modern and focused look over VS. If you're into that, its Vim emulation plugin is superb.
> WPF
Not its strong suit. VS is way better here. Rider only has a preview. Annoying: it doesn't use themes for DevExpress-libraries correctly in one project at work.
> file explorer
Pretty much like VS
> Git integration
In my experience nicer than in VS. Exposes git's features more easily than VS. Take it with a grain of salt because I use the CLI mostly anyway.
I hope this helps a bit. But you're probably better off trying it for a while if you can.