3 ms·

Probably the museum of failed products https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Failure https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Failure It’ll look good nex

• bookofjoe 2y ago
  As an early user of Google Glass, I can state that it was NOT a failed product in terms of functionality. It made excellent quality videos (in 2013) and featured WYSIWYG framing of whatever you were recording, unlike both Meta Stories glasses and Vision Pro in 2024, both of which produce content whose exact frame boundaries are unknowable while recording. Here is a video I shot in 2013 with Glass: https://youtu.be/gAkfPhlvSn8?si=PImNNDgbH3LTPdym https://youtu.be/gAkfPhlvSn8?si=PImNNDgbH3LTPdym
  • Maxamillion96 2y ago
    90 percent of failed products aren’t failed in terms of functionality- actual scams are rare- what makes them fail is that they don’t appeal to the majority of consumers. Google glass may have worked but it looked nerdy which wouldn’t be a negative here, but not to the casual Black Friday electronic consumer.
    • bookofjoe 2y ago
      Concur with everything you say.