3 ms·
I'm sure people will call out performance is likely due to the different nature of the beast that is now redis -- there are lots of wire compatible implementati
by parhamn 2y ago
I'm sure people will call out performance is likely due to the different nature of the beast that is now redis -- there are lots of wire compatible implementations that are faster thant redis, with some lost affordances.
Either way, the templating bit on the homepage is a pretty interesting concept. Storage and templating in one with write operations in the template. Im curious how this grows out and whether it will be great or a regret. Somewhat dynamic static sites like that could be fun.
- mkristiansen 2y agoOn the first part, yes there are pleanty of wire-compatable redis clones. And while those are interesting, its your second part that I find interesting as well. The idea of having a strong templating engine with a fast storage backend able to use dynamic content to deliver efficiently renderes websites with minimal hardware.