2 ms·
Absolutely not I’m serious and that is exactly what is going on, it would be trolling to pretend the opposite or accepted the status quo as final. Obviously we
by sharpshadow 2y ago
Absolutely not I’m serious and that is exactly what is going on, it would be trolling to pretend the opposite or accepted the status quo as final.
Obviously we need to use a way to not harm and destroy our environment more but we are on a good way on that. But technically we need much much more energy.
- croes 2y agoWe are not on a good way, we are far away from our goals and at the moment AI‘s is near the same as Bitcoin. We do things fast and expensive that could be done slow but cheap. The problem is we are running out of time. If you want more energy you first build clean energy sources then you can pump up consumption not the other way around.
- flemhans 2y agoAgreed, let's go!
- sharpshadow 2y agoThose goals you are referring to are made up as the illusion we are running out of time. It’s usually the other way around. If we would do things only if the resources are there in the first place we wouldn’t the progress we have.