4 ms·
In this context Windows Recall makes total sense now from a AI learning perspective for them. It’s actually a super cool development and I’m very exiting alrea
by sharpshadow 2y ago
In this context Windows Recall makes total sense now from a AI learning perspective for them.
It’s actually a super cool development and I’m very exiting already to let my computer use any software like a pro infront of me. Paint me canvas of a savanna sunset with animals silhouette, produce me a track of uk garage house, etc. everything with all the layers and elements in the software not just an finished output.
- croes 2y agoLots of energy consumption just to create a remix of something that already exists.
- sharpshadow 2y agoAbsolutely we need much much more energy and many many more powerful chips. Energy is a resource and we need to harvest more of it. I don’t understand why people make a point about energy consumption as it would be something bad.
- viraptor 2y agoCome on, the trolling is too obvious.
- sharpshadow 2y agoAbsolutely not I’m serious and that is exactly what is going on, it would be trolling to pretend the opposite or accepted the status quo as final. Obviously we need to use a way to not harm and destroy our environment more but we are on a good way on that. But technically we need much much more energy.
- croes 2y agoWe are not on a good way, we are far away from our goals and at the moment AI‘s is near the same as Bitcoin. We do things fast and expensive that could be done slow but cheap. The problem is we are running out of time. If you want more energy you first build clean energy sources then you can pump up consumption not the other way around.
- flemhans 2y agoAgreed, let's go!
- sharpshadow 2y agoThose goals you are referring to are made up as the illusion we are running out of time. It’s usually the other way around. If we would do things only if the resources are there in the first place we wouldn’t the progress we have.
- wwweston 2y agohttps://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2012/04/economist-meets-physicist/ https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2012/04/economist-meets-physicist... "the Earth has only one mechanism for releasing heat to space, and that’s via (infrared) radiation. We understand the phenomenon perfectly well, and can predict the surface temperature of the planet as a function of how much energy the human race produces. The upshot is that at a 2.3% growth rate, we would reach boiling temperature in about 400 years. And this statement is independent of technology. Even if we don’t have a name for the energy source yet, as long as it obeys thermodynamics, we cook ourselves with perpetual energy increase."
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]