4 ms·
> When the war ended in 1945, the military had huge stockpiles of food, including powdered cheese. The government liquidated these stockpiles, sometimes for pen
by Mistletoe 2y ago
> When the war ended in 1945, the military had huge stockpiles of food, including powdered cheese. The government liquidated these stockpiles, sometimes for pennies on the dollar, to private industry. Companies like Frito (later Frito-Lay), Kraft, and others found ways to use these wartime products. In 1948, the Frito company coated puffed cornmeal pieces with dehydrated cheese, and Cheetos were born.[26]
It is absolutely wild the butterfly effect of processed terrible food this may have caused and deaths from obesity. All from trying to find something to do with ultra cheap army surplus.
- zdw 2y agoCheetos popcorn is probably less bad overall, being a whole grain.
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoPerhaps, other than the "ruining perfectly good popcorn" part.
- vondur 2y agoI love the spicy Cheetos popcorn. Tasty, but filled with all of the Red #40 dye.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- namdnay 2y agoI’m wondering why on earth the military was storing cheese as a powder… the whole point of cheeses is that they are a great way to store milk. Why didn’t they just store cheese wheels? Surely powdering it makes it go off much faster?
- gnatman 2y agoFirst of all I don't think that's the whole point of cheese. Secondly, dehydrating and powdering dramatically extends shelf life and makes shipping cheaper.
- devilbunny 2y agoIt’s not the whole point of cheese in most cultures, but it’s a very effective method of turning summer grass into winter food. Which, especially in Alpine climates, is important. Native Americans, lacking domesticated ruminants, achieved similar results with pemmican, which is the same principle: protein + fat + dehydration = long-lasting nutritious food for survival. Not apparently very tasty, and they would certainly supplement it with anything else they could find, but it kept you from starving.
- lazide 2y agoWhy do you think herders would go through all the effort? ‘Not starving to death’ seems like a good reason, eh?
- oivey 2y agoIt says in the article. Powdering involves further dehydration, reducing weight and size. I’m guessing it also improves shelf life.
- ckozlowski 2y agoThis. Nescafe was great for the same reason, as it weighed much less than coffee grounds. It's impossible to overestimate how important this was. The U.S. military in WWII had to support an enormous force overseas, to a degree and extent that no other power had to approach. Everything that the force needed in the field had to first go on a ship to be sent overseas. With the U.S. Twelfth Army Group numbering over a million men alone in Europe, small changes to products were magnified at scale, saving tons of weight in the logistics chain.
- ceejayoz 2y agoThere's a probably apocryphal story that a Japanese higher-up realized the war was lost when they found out the US had enough spare capacity to build ice cream ships for in-theater cold treats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream_barge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream_barge).
- selimthegrim 2y agoI think there is a real story about a British/Australian general at Hamel arranging for hot meals in the trenches e: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Monash https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Monash
- ckozlowski 2y agoProbably apocryphal, but I'm sure there were similar conversations. Though from what I've read, many in the Japanese High Command were fully aware of the disparity in war-making potential between the U.S. and Japan. That Japan decided to go to war anyways despite knowing this is still discussed. There's a page over on combinedfleet.com (great resource and discussion) that goes into the numbers, and it's truly astonishing. U.S. output could be described as terrifying. http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm
- tsumnia 2y agoMilitary food is a really fascinating logistics problem - how do you feed people, potentially across a long period while engaging in calorically demanding tasks? Foodstuffs need to last as long as possible because supply lines are targeted or have been destroyed. That shipment you received may be one of your last. Cheese, like any food with significant moisture, can ultimately rot. Much of our modern processes are to somehow extend the life of the foodstuff over long periods. This boomed the overly processed food economy we currently have, but it was first built to simply make sure we had food for the long haul. Curing meats in salt is roughly the same process. In turns of cheese, powder has less moisture stored in the individual cheese granule but may also be reconstituted with added moisture. Powdered forms are easier to package for individual soldiers to carry for themselves rather than a large, bulkier wheel that needs its own storage and transportation methods.
- Animats 2y agoIt goes further back. Napoleon offered a prize in 1795 for some way to preserve food for soldiers.[1] The result was "canning" - heating, boiling, and sealing in an airtight container. Originally in glass jars. Later metal cans. Finally vacuum-packed plastic. Current products include MREs for the military, which are actually somewhat hard to buy commercially since Warnock got tired of dealing with preppers. They really want to sell these things by the container load. There are all kinds of knock-offs available. The real military MREs are designed for young soldiers in good condition doing heavy work, so three of them contain almost 4,000 calories. Civilian versions tend to be smaller portions. There's also the Humanitarian Daily Ration. It's kosher, halal, vegetarian, lactose-free, and nut-free. Also air-droppable without a parachute. It's basically lentils and beans. It's intended for people on the edge of starvation. The US military used to give out MREs in crises, but that was too much concentrated energy food for someone nearly starving and could sicken them. [1] https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2012/03/01/147751097/why-napoleon-offered-a-prize-for-inventing-canned-food https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2012/03/01/147751097/why-...
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y agoThere's a really good episode of 99% Invisible that explains how much of the technology used to produce food in grocery stores was developed by the military. One of the most surprising, for me, was chewy chocolate chip cookies.
- appletrotter 2y agoWhat? What would make you think that dehydrating a food would make it go bad quicker?
- triceratops 2y agoIt's wild to think WW2 indirectly killed people a decade later by making them fat. When you hear about surplus materiel killing people, food isn't what comes to mind.
- selimthegrim 2y agoI believe Zero Mostel is the authority on this.
- willismichael 2y agoPlease tell us more about this. I'm really hoping there is a related Zero Mostel video that you can share.
- selimthegrim 2y agohttps://jhv.blogs.com/eatatjoes/2004/03/folks_lets_eat.html https://jhv.blogs.com/eatatjoes/2004/03/folks_lets_eat.html https://larvatus.livejournal.com/384861.html https://larvatus.livejournal.com/384861.html
- tekla 2y agoI always wonder why people belittle cheap food and abundance that helped solve famine and operational logistics. Obesity exists because food is insanely abundant and cheap because people wanted to solve the problem of people starving to death
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- appletrotter 2y agoBecause processed foods are associated with many health complications. Sources to back your theorem on the cause of obesity?
- tekla 2y agoYou get obese since you eat too many calories. Humans obey thermodynamics.
- makeitdouble 2y agoI think your point on nutritious food being widely available for cheap is spot on. That said going back to entropy to explain how a structure of dozens of trillions of cells harvest energy from foreign structures following a lifetime of heuristics is utterly misleading. In particular it makes it sound scientific, when we have very little practical knowledge on how it works at scale and can't reliable do falsifiable experiments to prove our theories. I mean, we're still literally burning stuff[0] as a proxy for the digestion process because we have no other way of coming up with a stable number. Which gives us aberrations like gasoline having higher nutritious value than potatoes (which totally makes sense in thermodynamics, I concur) [0] https://www.livescience.com/62808-how-calories-are-calculated.html https://www.livescience.com/62808-how-calories-are-calculate...
- Mistletoe 2y agoUnfortunately it is a lot easier to eat too many calories on Cheetos and Doritos Locos tacos than less processed foods like salads.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoPeople are entirely too preoccupied with the quality of food instead of the quantity. I think it is an intentional or subconscious distraction. It is easy to eat excessive calories when you are consuming sugar coated fats. Doubly so if you are sedentary.
- ikr678 2y agoSimilarly, the use of french oak for aging french wines is largely due to a surplus of oak from from government forests that were originally planted in support of naval ship building.