In France, it would be Tara's responsibility to prove her claims. It makes more sense than the opposite. One of the rationale of this principle is that setting

In France, it would be Tara's responsibility to prove her claims. It makes more sense than the opposite. One of the rationale of this principle is that setting up a trial to contest defamatory claims is reproducing the defamatory action. Beside, if someone claims you are a pedophile, a human body eater or like to kill for instance, how could you objectively prove you're not ? Those who claim things should logically have the burden of proof, especially if it is defamatory. This is surprising because it seem to me like a common sense limit to free speech. It is also why I feel much safer in France.