3 ms·

> That would be like the police harassing whatever landscaper is doing all the town buildings. If the company wasn't adequately screening their landscaping cre

• potato3732842 2y ago
  >If the company wasn't adequately screening their landscaping crews the police would at the very least have a quiet word with them. They could. It's well within their discretion. Perhaps in cases where optics look like they might become important but unless there's a problem that makes them need to look like they're doing something they likely won't because they don't want to meddle in what some other department has going on. I wouldn't count on them going out of their way like this by default. >Is the company the "dude" in this scenario? I don't really understand. The feds mostly harass employers but they also go after individuals if they accumulate criminal records, are wanted in their home countries for really bad stuff, etc. My point was that the employer and specific individual check boxes that make them both last in line to get harassed.
  • triceratops 2y ago
    In this case the employer has very visibly broken laws. They should have a record.
    • potato3732842 2y ago
      It's visible now. It was probably on the down low before. This is probably one of those case where "nothing changes until there's a body"