3 ms·
To me, Threes poorly straddles the middle ground between a "real game" and a "time filler". If I want a "real game" I'll play Factorio or something. When I
by bryanlarsen 2y ago
To me, Threes poorly straddles the middle ground between a "real game" and a "time filler". If I want a "real game" I'll play Factorio or something. When I need a break from mental work I can pull 2048. I rarely want anything in between.
- MattRix 2y agoLots of people do want that “middle ground” game, especially people who exclusively play games on mobile rather than PC or console.
- bryanlarsen 2y ago[flagged]
- MattRix 2y ago[flagged]
- dspillett 2y agoAn opinion was stated. An opinion that will no doubt be agreed with by many, me for one. But absolutely no claim was made that it is correct for all people. Or even most people. To answer your sort-of question: > Ok? But lots of people do want that “middle ground” game… Those lots of people can play threes, or other games that exist in such a middle ground. Not every game needs to support every play style, nor does every person need to like every game. Or to be facetious and answer you in your own style: > Ok? But lots of people do want that “middle ground” game… OK? But lots of people don't want the “middle ground” game, especially people who like more complex games on desktop/console and only simpler time-fillers on mobile. Or even more so: > Ok? But lots of people do want that “middle ground” game… Yes… and?
- MattRix 2y agoAlright I'll admit the "Ok? But" was unnecessary, and I've taken it out.
- keeganpoppen 2y ago[flagged]