> Funding for any experiment would have to include 100% extra because presumably every experiment done would also have to duplicate another, randomly chosen exp

> Funding for any experiment would have to include 100% extra because presumably every experiment done would also have to duplicate another, randomly chosen experiment. If this were a universal policy then we'd be no worse off because everyone would face the same challenges. > Smaller institutions would struggle to re-create experiments from better funded institutions. That's already the case. > Getting the second experiment funded would always be difficult because you probably wouldn’t be able to go to the same sources. I thought we were discussing how the original experiment's funding already included funding for the replication?