3 ms·

You seem to think it's a different issue. It is not. There are “legal implications” of disobeying the orders and disagreeing to serve in the military. There a

You seem to think it's a different issue. It is not. There are “legal implications” of disobeying the orders and disagreeing to serve in the military. There are “legal implications” of calling the glorious leader a crooked mobster. There are “legal implications” of having banned books on display in a library. (Not officially banned, but the officials are making scary faces because someone heard that higher ups discussed something, and the librarian rushes to hide the you-know-whom and you-know-what without any specific orders.) There are “legal implications” of discussing this and that, and posting links, when it is officially declared “illegal information”. etc. Comrade Stalin does not force anyone to do that himself. Regular people — you and me — do that. If was possible to handle the case properly without bowing to anyone. If there was an immediate security danger, announce that. If legal team told you to stop working with certain entities, inform the people properly. I suspect that Linux leadership is now between the rock and the hard place because some men in suits only strongly hinted they need to do that, and now, then they acted, they don't have a single piece of paper to prove it was under someone's pressure. A classic trick to manipulate people who believe in “matters of national security”. It is highly likely that most people who vehemently show support, and ignore the obvious “nothing to see here, citizen” details are simply trying to keep the bubble of “living in a democratic country, unlike those shitty places” intact. After all, media and politicians are 100% set on using war spectacle to sell the feeling of (in)security, and blame everything on external and internal enemies. It's the same tool Putin and company used to remain in power.

tankenmate 2y ago
They didn't remove these people from the git logs, merely from the maintainers list. It's not an issue of speech, it's an issue of authority to submit changes to the kernel.
lostmsu 2y ago
> There are “legal implications” of disobeying the orders and disagreeing to serve in the military. Strictly speaking, nothing stops the guy from leaving Baikal - I don't think they are a branch of military per se. But then he won't be paid to contribute to Linux kernel.
- ogurechny 2y ago
  This isn't about maintainers. This is about Linux leadership. People wonder if Linus was grabbed by the balls by some US officials. That's when you have to decide between having principles and obedience. That's what I was talking about, and what others imply.
  - tankenmate 2y ago
    From the outside it looks pretty much like Linus is following US law. As to the penalties for this; check Appendix A to Title 31 (Code of Federal Regulations), Subtitle B, Chapter 5, Part 501. Fines can be up to and including the financial amount found to be in question. And this can be affected by; wilfulness, recklessness, pattern of conduct, managerial involvement (amongst others). Could be up to millions. A criminal conviction may be up to 30 years in prison. So the choices are a) follow the rule of law, or b) face years in court and possibly go to prison for 30 years. And for the later, to achieve what? Those people will never get back on the list (while the sanctions are in force) even if Linus "stood up" to the US Govt. As the prayer of serenity says "Give me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference". Getting sanctions overturned can be a good thing if they are unjust (and I personally can't see how these sanctions are unjust), but keeping someone as a maintainer on the Linux kernel is almost certainly not the way to do it. If YOU want to do something about it, then fork the kernel and invite those people who have been removed as maintainers to join you.
    - ogurechny 2y ago
      We're not talking about reinstating anyone, or doing anything about sanctions. We're talking about the execution, which was deliberately off. As if someone important started beating his fist on the table. I suppose that not Russian, but fellow American citizens should be the first to worry about the reason. You are wrong about things people cannot change. All of this depends on “small people” believing they are small, and finding convenient stereotypical excuses for “doing what everyone does”. Not on some magical evil powers. There's a lot of advice in those threads telling people what they should do. I wonder if people are going to follow them themselves, and rush to storm offices of agencies and military bases to figure out what's happening. On the other hand, if you're saying “I'm fine if one day they torture Torvalds until he gives all the passwords, as long as it's in full accordance with the law™, and for the Big Good Cause. It's something that we cannot change, la-la-la~~~”, then state it clearly.

tankenmate 2y ago

They didn't remove these people from the git logs, merely from the maintainers list. It's not an issue of speech, it's an issue of authority to submit changes to the kernel.

lostmsu 2y ago

> There are “legal implications” of disobeying the orders and disagreeing to serve in the military. Strictly speaking, nothing stops the guy from leaving Baikal - I don't think they are a branch of military per se. But then he won't be paid to contribute to Linux kernel.

ogurechny 2y ago
This isn't about maintainers. This is about Linux leadership. People wonder if Linus was grabbed by the balls by some US officials. That's when you have to decide between having principles and obedience. That's what I was talking about, and what others imply.
- tankenmate 2y ago
  From the outside it looks pretty much like Linus is following US law. As to the penalties for this; check Appendix A to Title 31 (Code of Federal Regulations), Subtitle B, Chapter 5, Part 501. Fines can be up to and including the financial amount found to be in question. And this can be affected by; wilfulness, recklessness, pattern of conduct, managerial involvement (amongst others). Could be up to millions. A criminal conviction may be up to 30 years in prison. So the choices are a) follow the rule of law, or b) face years in court and possibly go to prison for 30 years. And for the later, to achieve what? Those people will never get back on the list (while the sanctions are in force) even if Linus "stood up" to the US Govt. As the prayer of serenity says "Give me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference". Getting sanctions overturned can be a good thing if they are unjust (and I personally can't see how these sanctions are unjust), but keeping someone as a maintainer on the Linux kernel is almost certainly not the way to do it. If YOU want to do something about it, then fork the kernel and invite those people who have been removed as maintainers to join you.
  - ogurechny 2y ago
    We're not talking about reinstating anyone, or doing anything about sanctions. We're talking about the execution, which was deliberately off. As if someone important started beating his fist on the table. I suppose that not Russian, but fellow American citizens should be the first to worry about the reason. You are wrong about things people cannot change. All of this depends on “small people” believing they are small, and finding convenient stereotypical excuses for “doing what everyone does”. Not on some magical evil powers. There's a lot of advice in those threads telling people what they should do. I wonder if people are going to follow them themselves, and rush to storm offices of agencies and military bases to figure out what's happening. On the other hand, if you're saying “I'm fine if one day they torture Torvalds until he gives all the passwords, as long as it's in full accordance with the law™, and for the Big Good Cause. It's something that we cannot change, la-la-la~~~”, then state it clearly.