4 ms·
Just two cents: 1) It shows no differences between GPLv2 and GPLv3. It's not a good sign. 2) I would put shitloads of banners everywhere saying that you're us
by wowoc 14y ago
Just two cents:
1) It shows no differences between GPLv2 and GPLv3. It's not a good sign.
2) I would put shitloads of banners everywhere saying that you're using this site at your own risk.
- beaumartinez 14y agoShould probably be http://ianaltldrlegal/ http://ianaltldrlegal/
- reidrac 14y agoBesides the UI it's confusing. For example, if you check the GPLv3 it says "Must: Include Source", which is incorrect (you must include the source code ONLY if there's distribution). If you click on the "Include Source" text, then it shows a note saying "Copies of the software/instructions to obtain copies must be distributed with the software". The quick summary isn't brilliant either. As TL;DR doesn't work very well if you can get incorrect information.
- laughinghan 14y agoFrom Kevin (TLDRLegal Guy): Got it. I am adding some things to distinguish the two.