3 ms·

It'd be nice to list what those "various compliance requirements" are on a public open source project.

• markvdb 2y ago
  At least part of that might very well be illegal.
  • llm_trw 2y ago
    Then it sounds like public open source projects are now illegal in the US. We should act accordingly.
    • michaelmrose 2y ago
      Alternatively we can continue like normal because not much of value will be lost. Git is inherently decentralized. If A requires work by C they can pull it directly or B can pull from C and A from B. There is no inherent issue with C's contributions coming in by way of B especially if B vetted and examined said contributions personally.
  • consumer451 2y ago
    Please see the legal reason in the sibling comment.
• fragmede 2y ago
  Not open source specific, but: > Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, has issued a new determination under Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, which prohibits the supply to any person in the Russian Federation of (1) IT consultancy and design services; and (2) IT support services and cloud-based services for enterprise management software and design and manufacturing software. The determination will take effect on September 12, 2024. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2404#:~:text=14071%2C%20which%20prohibits%20the%20supply,effect%20on%20September%2012%2C%202024 https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2404#:~:text....
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]