4 ms·

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh ht

by epcoa 2y ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh

sph 2y ago
Now that's just silly. And I see the backwards keyword terminators (LOOP/POOL). I have wondered why we have case/esac, if/fi but while/done. I imagine the author himself figured that while/elihw would just be entirely ridiculous.
- pavlov 2y ago
  Just call it wyl/lyw. Pronunciation maintained, problem solved.
- giucal 2y ago
  > I have wondered why we have case/esac, if/fi but while/done. With the reverse-keyword convention we'd get "od", not "elihw", though. while ... for ... do do ... ... od od The 'od' utility already existed, apparently, so Bourne opted for "done". [edit: typos]
  - epcoa 2y ago
    No, there’s OD. DONE is different but no less perverse.