4 ms·
I think they mean that there is more than one asynchronous paradigm. Actors is one alternative I can think of.
by onjectic 2y ago
I think they mean that there is more than one asynchronous paradigm. Actors is one alternative I can think of.
- palata 2y agoWhere an actor has its own thread and communicates with a channel, right?
- pdimitar 2y agoNot necessarily, a lot of actors can be sharing the same OS thread and be preemptively switched away from when they hit a certain limit of instructions or start an I/O call. Erlang demonstrates this very well because it works there without a glitch 99.99% of the time (and the remaining 0.01% are because of native code that does not yield control).