I disagree with you on this. If you go through my history on LLM’s you’ll see that I didn’t consider them more than fancy auto-complete. I still think of it mai

I disagree with you on this. If you go through my history on LLM’s you’ll see that I didn’t consider them more than fancy auto-complete. I still think of it mainly as fancy auto-compete for a lot of things, but we’ve begun using Claude in our porting of our C to Rust. Claude does it really, really, well. You have to look it over, but it’s far more efficient than any one of us can without the assistance. I don’t have the exact numbers but we’re close to a 90% accuracy on what is accepted without corrections. We follow a YAGNI approach to our code architecture and abstractions, meaning it’s very straight forward with things happening where they are written and not in 9 million places like Clean Code lovers try to do. Our C services and Libraries are also fairly small and “one purpose”. I’m not sure you would be wrong on larger code bases, at least not right now. With what we see Claude do now though, I don’t think we’re far from a world where Software Developers are going to do significantly different work. I also think quite a lot of the stuff we do today will no longer exist.