2 ms·
I mean, yes. We're talking about the US, after all, the only free country in the Western world that explicitly defines liberty as a function of gun violence in
by krapp 2y ago
I mean, yes. We're talking about the US, after all, the only free country in the Western world that explicitly defines liberty as a function of gun violence in its Constitution. Access to guns is never the problem. It can never be the problem and it will never be the problem. It must never be the problem.
- akimbostrawman 2y ago>explicitly defines liberty as a function of gun violence in its Constitution That's not what it says or means. The right to keep and bear arms is explicity for self defence which is to prevent violence and protect. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."