3 ms·
Objectively better to what? Git usage is only one part of a wider engineering org. That like saying "bugless code is objectively better" without considering ti
by hansonkd 2y ago
Objectively better to what?
Git usage is only one part of a wider engineering org. That like saying "bugless code is objectively better" without considering time to delivery, engineering resources, etc.
- rontdrr2 2y ago[dead]
- wakawaka28 2y agoBetter to work with of course. If you have valid reasons to have branches, such as a need to ship multiple versions, I don't have a problem with that. But day-to-day work is better done via rebasing rather than making a ton of public branches that get merged. If you know what you're doing then rebasing is just as easy as merging. As others have said, git rerere helps a lot too.