3 ms·
On the flip side, if Apple can keep most/all the processing on device, I'll accept a modest reduction in quality compared to ChatGPT. Admittedly I haven't trie
by rootusrootus 2y ago
On the flip side, if Apple can keep most/all the processing on device, I'll accept a modest reduction in quality compared to ChatGPT. Admittedly I haven't tried Apple Intelligence yet so I don't know just how big the reduction in quality is.
- paul7986 2y agoThat's cool... personally Im most interested in cool tech/innovation over privacy if that's what you mean by keep the processing on the device.
- threeseed 2y agoMany of us however would strongly prefer that our photos, documents, emails, contacts etc not be stored unencrypted on a server. And the capabilities of this model would still be limited as well given that Apple is not going to be able to host a large parameter one for each user.
- paul7986 2y agoyeah everyone is different ... im either an innovator (of go nowhere technology lol) or an early adopter. Like Im enjoying my Ray Ban Metas since last October (use them daily). Yet for many they are a privacy nightmare.
- aucisson_masque 2y ago> if Apple can keep most/all the processing on device, I'll accept a modest reduction in quality compared to ChatGPT. Be ready to accept a huge decrease in quality, even compared to chatgpt 3.5 Phones are not computer, they use battery. Whatever apple do, it can't beat the law of physics. There is no way but send it all on remote computer for ai.
- rootusrootus 2y agoAgreed, but the kind of stuff I want it to be capable of is way more limited than I'd ask of ChatGPT. I've tried a little model on my iPhone (Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct) that was better than I expected, both in capability and in responsiveness. Gives me hope for the future of on-device processing.