7 ms·

Hey, thanks -- this is great stuff! I tried looking around at these links but I couldn't find the actual lawsuit itself, and I'm curious what they specifically

Hey, thanks -- this is great stuff! I tried looking around at these links but I couldn't find the actual lawsuit itself, and I'm curious what they specifically say. There's a difference between saying that a compounding pharmacy is selling junk claiming that it is semaglutide (that is, making false claims that may reflect on NN when the substance is ineffective), vs. claims that the drug is being produced in violation of their intellectual property rights for the synthesis of the drug.

throwup238 2y ago
You can just search for the the phrase "Novo Nordisk v [company name]". For example: NOVO NORDISK INC. v AESTHETIC MAISON LLC and AESTHETIC CASA LLC: https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Novo-Nordisk-v-Aesthetic-Maison-Complaint.pdf https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Nov... NOVO NORDISK INC. v MEDIOAK PHARMACY LLC: https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Novo-Nordisk-v-MedioakPharmacy-Complaint.pdf https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Nov... NOVO NORDISK A/S AND NOVO NORDISK INC. v BOF MEDICAL CENTER, INC.: https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Novo-Nordisk-v-BOF-Medical-Center-Complaint.pdf https://www.safemedicines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Nov... In the Aesthetic Maison and Medioak pharmacy cases, Novo Nordisk alleges that they're selling a product claiming to contain semaglutide without a prescription or FDA approval. In the BOF Medical case, they're claiming "trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition." They're not suing for damages, just injunctive relief ordering the defendants to stop. It doesn't look like it even matters to their cases whether the products contain real semaglutide.