3 ms·
> "...but part of the issue is that their shows just aren't that good..." Hard disagree from a personal view. Also statistically, I don't think you can strongl
by bluetidepro 2y ago
> "...but part of the issue is that their shows just aren't that good..."
Hard disagree from a personal view. Also statistically, I don't think you can strongly claim this since many of their shows have lots of awards if you go off that metric. I haven't done the calculations but I would guess that their content to award ratio is even higher than many other networks.
- Suppafly 2y ago>I haven't done the calculations but I would guess that their content to award ratio is even higher than many other networks. That is probably true, but only because they have so little content overall. It is nice that it's not choke full of low budget reality nonsense and foreign stuff, but they also have basically none of the back catalog of content that other services have.