4 ms·
> Can we also go to XHTML5, while on it? Personally, I would like that, but in practice I don't think it's ever going to be a thing, so I didn't even bother ad
by kristoff_it 2y ago
> Can we also go to XHTML5, while on it?
Personally, I would like that, but in practice I don't think it's ever going to be a thing, so I didn't even bother adding support for it in SuperHTML, sorry!
- notpushkin 2y agoTotally understandable, you do you! But I think the problem is, it’s not yet a thing because of the lack of tooling. It is kind of a chicken and egg situation here. Would you perhaps be open to a PR, maybe? (I would love to work on something like that, although I’m swamped right now and can’t promise anything.)
- kristoff_it 2y agoYes, I'd be open to a PR, but I think the other comment on lack of browser support is the actual obstacle and really don't see that changing easily.
- jraph 2y agoWhat's missing in browsers for XHTML5? Don't they understand and validate the XML and allow using the HTML5 elements when some page is served with a application/xhtml+xml mimetype? Don't they, at worst, degrade to html5 parsing? (I only tried writing polyglot syntax, with only stuff allowed in both XHTML and HTML syntaxes) Or are you concerned with the unrecoverable mechanism?