3 ms·
Don't see the point of entertaining continuing to employ a workforce that threatens to sabotage you on the biggest night of the year for your company.
by whywhywhywhy 2y ago
Don't see the point of entertaining continuing to employ a workforce that threatens to sabotage you on the biggest night of the year for your company.
- ceejayoz 2y agoI mean, that goes both ways. The union doesn't see a point to negotiating with a brick wall, either, and a strike is intended to generate leverage to push negotiations forwards. That's how the whole system works. > “Currently in management’s counter, they have proposed a one-percent general wage increase,” said Svorcan-Merola, who pointed out that publisher Sulzberger’s total compensation increased by more than 50 percent in 2023, per publicly available records. “So we think [one percent] is a little bit low.”
- whywhywhywhy 2y ago> The union doesn't see a point to negotiating with a brick wall They're free to work somewhere else, no ones forcing them to stay.
- ceejayoz 2y agoSure. They're also free to strike, a technique that's a lot more likely to get them at least some of what they're asking for. The same applies for Boeing. They're free to give in. Production could restart today!
- blitzar 2y agoContinue to employ them, force them to strike on the "biggest night of the year for your company" (i'm thinking do some pay cuts or something more) - then let the striking workers watch on as nobody cares and realise that you no longer have any bargaining power.
- DonHopkins 2y ago[flagged]
- prmoustache 2y agoHow is that sabotage? Not doing work != making stuff break