Fascinating, and downright uncanny. I could have written it. Now I can share it with others and say "This is 96% me." - I use gap instead of gaa. (He also

Fascinating, and downright uncanny. I could have written it. Now I can share it with others and say "This is 96% me." - I use gap instead of gaa. (He also uses git add -p, but no alias?) - I didn't have 'git lr', but I do now. - I use `git commit --amend` more often. - Pull request workflows exactly the same. - Same policy on rebasing main onto feature branches. - Same behavior around reviewing and self-reviewing. - Same tendency to commit and cherry-pick off a branch. - ... My Atuin frequency table for git-specific commands: gs # git status gap # git add -p gl # git log gc # git commit (with -m, -v or --amend) ga # git add gdc # git diff --cached gd # git diff gp # git push (sometimes with --force-with-lease) gco # git checkout gpr # git pull --rebase --prune git restore git config git rebase I actually use Conventional Commits. I spent a total of 5 minutes bike-shedding "chore". I didn't use "chore" before, because I don't get it, but I care more about consistency than being right. So with my current colleague, I use "chore" as he does. Another big difference is: I used `git worktree` extensively in my previous job. I don't now. I used it extensively in my old job, since I maintained multiple long-lived contexts, and got distracted a lot. I don't do that recently, so it's probably a work culture thing.