4 ms·
> you should be reasonable about it. I don't get it. Shouldn't it be the seller's obligation to give a reasonable lifetime estimate? Like, give me a five year
by red_trumpet 2y ago
> you should be reasonable about it.
I don't get it. Shouldn't it be the seller's obligation to give a reasonable lifetime estimate? Like, give me a five year warranty, if you want to advertise your socks last for five years of regular use. Don't pretend it's unlimited when it isn't.
- timnetworks 2y agobuncha people caught wind and purchase the product used/torn for pennies on the dollar, and send it in, in order to take advantage of the offer (and the retailer).
- from-nibly 2y agoStatement still stands. The company can't afford lifetime because of this possibility. They should change the terms. They could say single owner lifetime or something like that.
- toader 2y ago[dead]
- ApolloFortyNine 2y ago>Shouldn't it be the seller's obligation to give a reasonable lifetime estimate? Not sure how you define this or maintain it. These socks are guaranteed for 100 wears? Can't count wears. These socks last a year. Is that daily wear? One of 10 pairs? Only air dried? Was the user running daily marathons? You can extend this to pretty much every product. >last for five years of regular use. What's regular use?