> This voting system approach works surprisingly well within the bounds of common knowledge and frequently discussed topics - it mimics correct answers based on

> This voting system approach works surprisingly well within the bounds of common knowledge and frequently discussed topics - it mimics correct answers based on training data. However, it begins to fall apart when a question is sufficiently out of bounds of the training data. Those blogs are always philosophical. Same is true for myself, I don't have formal training in biology or group theory and hence I talk nonsense when it comes to that. The only difference is: I can say that I don't know it whereas LLMs are hallucinating still too much. > LLMs Aren't Thinking, They're Just Counting Votes Same is kind of true for neurons in your brain. (let's see if I'm hallucinate or if it's true :p)