> Today, ARM's success has contributed to Intel's market plateau I don't buy this? ARM is applied in embedded devices or mobile hardware, neither of which Int

> Today, ARM's success has contributed to Intel's market plateau I don't buy this? ARM is applied in embedded devices or mobile hardware, neither of which Intel really "owned" in the first place. x86 is still the first-class datacenter option and I frankly don't see ARM taking it over on the desktop or server. The people with architectural licenses aren't interested in competing, which leaves Apple as really the only flexible customer, and we all know Apple was going to replace Intel eventually. So... Intel persists. And with DXVK running fine on RISC-V, I'm well within my right to say it's faster than I think: https://youtu.be/5UMUEM0gd34 https://youtu.be/5UMUEM0gd34 Honestly AMD has contributed more to Intel's demise than ARM ever did. When I read blog posts like this I really wonder how proximal the author actually is to the industry - it's an assertion that lacks evidence.