3 ms·

I am saying a lot of "IPv6 issues" are not because of the protocol itself, but rather it is self-inflicted pain. You quickly assuming IPv6 is a "shitty technol

I am saying a lot of "IPv6 issues" are not because of the protocol itself, but rather it is self-inflicted pain. You quickly assuming IPv6 is a "shitty technology" means that you are part of the problem. Congratulations, you just proved my point. >the one we're using now The one we are using now is held by a bandaid. It's insane that, for me to connect to other computer, I need a middleman (STUN or other coordination services) to help me with it.

otabdeveloper4 2y ago
> It's insane that, for me to connect to other computer, I need a middleman It's not insane, it's the default and correct assumption. I certainly don't want random computers connecting to mine just because they want to. STUN is a shitty solution to this problem, but IPv6 doesn't provide any solution at all, so a shitty solution wins here. Sorry.
- orangeboats 2y ago
  > IPv6 doesn't provide any solution at all 1. Reject the IPv6 solution 2. Say IPv6 doesn't have a solution 3. ??? 4. Profit Sigh.