4 ms·
I don't think you can accurately identify "good" weather for even a modest group of random people, because people want different things, for different reasons.
by stephenr 2y ago
I don't think you can accurately identify "good" weather for even a modest group of random people, because people want different things, for different reasons.
More likely would be identifying locations with similar weather/climate - or even partially similar;
- X has weather very similar to Y;
- A has weather similar to B, but gets colder in winter.
Imagine trying to define a "goodness" of food. It's impossible. But identifying similar dishes is much easier and much more useful.
- profsummergig 2y agoFantastic points. As I got deeper into the project, I started to realize the futility of it. And have been leaning towards finding "doppelganger" places, sister-cities (regions). The way you framed it ("A has weather similar to B, but gets colder in winter"), has clarified the project for me.