This is not worth reading, because it was not generated as part of a deductive process, where you start with some facts and work your way to some entailments.

This is not worth reading, because it was not generated as part of a deductive process, where you start with some facts and work your way to some entailments. Instead, the causal process that let to the creation of this book and ad was that the political patronage relationship between American progressives and American tech companies fell apart. This leads to demand for post-hoc justifications for subsequent changes in cash allocation, lawfare budget allocation, etc. The author started with the conclusion "... and that's why we have to disenfranchise tech companies" and worked backwards from there. Therefore, this document cannot, on expectation, communicate to you any useful entailments, except insofar as that conclusion might incidentally be correct for reasons totally unrelated to the author's thought process.