LibreSSL also has focused on removing code which is viewed as being actively bad (poor/problematic reimplementations of stdlib features), or less valuable or no

LibreSSL also has focused on removing code which is viewed as being actively bad (poor/problematic reimplementations of stdlib features), or less valuable or not aligned with OpenBSD's goals (ex: FIPS support). It's probably worth benching just to see the impact of these changes - the fork happened around the same time as BoringSSL, which as these graphs show has quite different perf characteristics.