The key phrase they used is "track the movement of any individual". So the state has a legal right to track where cars go, but not necessarily where the drivers

The key phrase they used is "track the movement of any individual". So the state has a legal right to track where cars go, but not necessarily where the drivers/passengers go. It's mostly going to be a semantic difference in situations with a lone driver, but if it's a shared vehicle all the drivers enjoy plausible deniability.