3 ms·
All the project/product managers that think they are the ones responsible for team success are going to get a rude awakening. When they try to do the job of an
by bloopernova 2y ago
All the project/product managers that think they are the ones responsible for team success are going to get a rude awakening. When they try to do the job of an entire team, it's going to come apart pretty quickly. LLMs are a tool, nothing more, they don't magically imbue the user with competency.
- digging 2y agoThey're not going to try to do the job, they're going to hire cheaper, worse SWEs to manipulate AI... and then things will come apart pretty quickly :) But they'll still have someone else to blame. > LLMs are a tool, nothing more, they don't magically imbue the user with competency. Not a good take though, IMO. They're literally a tool that can teach you how to use them, or anything else.
- bloopernova 2y ago> > LLMs are a tool, nothing more, they don't magically imbue the user with competency. > Not a good take though, IMO. They're literally a tool that can teach you how to use them, or anything else. I disagree. In their current incarnation, LLMs require a human subject matter expert to determine if the output is valid. In the project manager team lead example, the LLM won't tell you if the database is sized correctly, or if you even need a database.
- DebtDeflation 2y ago>they're going to hire cheaper, worse SWEs to manipulate AI This is 100% the play. Right now you can hire 5 devs in India to do the job of 1 competent US dev and save 30-40% on total cost. Add in AI and it will only take 3 devs in India to do the same work, and can now save 50-60% on total cost.
- throw234234234 2y agoThey will ensure that before that happens that won't occur; I'm sure they will cover their bases. AI is great for PM's/Product/C-Suite types (i.e. the decision makers). Bad for the do'ers/builders long term IMO.