3 ms·
Had a play about with it for a few weeks. Was interesting enough but didn't really get to the point were having multiple LLMs combining their various outputs fe
by NomDePlum 2y ago
Had a play about with it for a few weeks. Was interesting enough but didn't really get to the point were having multiple LLMs combining their various outputs felt like much of a benefit.
The founder seemed super enthusiastic and constantly tweeting about how great everything was. My guess is it's mostly hype but I guess now they have funding they might prove me wrong.
- fsndz 2y agoI had the exact same experience. Just calling an API call "agent" and giving it a system prompt like "you are a robust data analyst" doesn’t magically make it one. That’s not how it works. My first conclusion is that it’s mostly hype. And honestly, $18M isn’t nearly enough to make AI agents reliable and useful, because solving that would require breakthroughs in reasoning—something we're nowhere close to. Even o1 fails miserably at most real life reasoning tasks despite the hype from openai. (https://www.lycee.ai/blog/why-sam-altman-is-wrong https://www.lycee.ai/blog/why-sam-altman-is-wrong) It seems Crewai is more focused on deploying AI agents now, hoping that reliability will eventually come from improvements made by foundation model companies. But that's a highly uncertain, almost wishful, scenario. And they shouldn't go around screaming that AI agents are reliable in production yet.