3 ms·
> Its also not a great example of reasoning, as it is so simple. I agree with that. Admitedly this was the simplest thing i could think of. But it feels we are
by krisoft 2y ago
> Its also not a great example of reasoning, as it is so simple.
I agree with that. Admitedly this was the simplest thing i could think of. But it feels we are just moving the goal post here. “Any reasoning” is what was asked. Now you are asking “a bit more complicated reasoning”.
> there is no real deduction
It does in my opinion correctly deducts that the commenter is skeptical. That is a deduction. What does a “real deduction” mean?
Is there a sufficiently complicated prompt where you could test if an AI is reasoning according to your definition?
- MattPalmer1086 2y agoI guess what is missing for me is that there is no verification of the truth of it's responses. When a human "reasons" they are trying to take some information and find an answer that apparently fits. We don't just blurt out something that may or may not fit. Or at least, if we did we wouldn't call it reasoning. That an LLM can still produce answers which are correct some of the time is amazing. I just think without the ability to step back and assess it's response, it doesn't hit the bar of reasoning for me.