4 ms·

Don't use that license, use something similar like MIT, BSD or Apache instead.

• kurisufag 2y ago
  would you mind pointing out why? those are very dissimilar licenses in the sense that wtfpl is basically a cute way of putting something into the public domain, while MIT et. al. do actually have (albeit minor and reasonable) restrictions on the conduct of people using the code.
  • poizan42 2y ago
    There is no disclaimer of liability and implied warranty. You may be on the hook for damages if someone uses your code under the WTFPL and there is a bug that causes them to lose money.
  • leni536 2y ago
    You can use zero-clause BSD[1] or MIT no-attribution[2]. [1] https://opensource.org/license/0bsd https://opensource.org/license/0bsd [2] https://opensource.org/license/mit-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0
• dokyun 2y ago
  WTFPL is a fine license. It's even FSF approved.
  • josephcsible 2y ago
    The FSF certifies that it's a free software license that's compatible with the GPL, but they recommend against using it: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#WTFPL https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#WTFPL