4 ms·
That’s not a valid license. Without a file or statement in the repository, I guess it’s a proprietary piece of software that people cannot legally fork.
by JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B 2y ago
That’s not a valid license. Without a file or statement in the repository, I guess it’s a proprietary piece of software that people cannot legally fork.
- droideqa 2y agoIt is public domain if there is no license.
- recursive 2y agoThat is not true.
- droideqa 2y agoI checked; you are right.
- ClassyJacket 2y agoThe opposite is true. Even if you publish the source, if you don't add a licence, you still have full copyright and all rights to it.
- account42 2y agoActully, the act of putting it on GitHub might be considered an implied license to clone and fork the project since those are normal GitHub functions. Still, an explicit open source license that also makes sure to grant those rights outside of GitHub would be better.