3 ms·
I don't think that's correct. This looks like a new model. Significant jump in math and gpqa scores.
by usaar333 2y ago
I don't think that's correct. This looks like a new model. Significant jump in math and gpqa scores.
- diggan 2y agoIf the architecture is the same, and the training scripts/data is the same, but the training yielded slightly different weights (but still same model architecture), is it a new model or just a iteration on the same model? What if it isn't even a re-training from scratch but a fine-tune of an existing model/weights release, is it a new version then? Would be more like a iteration, or even a fork I suppose.
- cooper_ganglia 2y agoYes, it's a new model, but not a Claude 4. It's the same, but a bit different; Claude 3.6 makes sense to me.
- HarHarVeryFunny 2y agoCould be just additional post-training (aka finetuning) for coding/etc.
- bloedsinnig 2y agoI would assume that 3.5 means that the base training (which takes weeks/month) wasn't changed but only finetuning happened.