Not my experience with it: the language is indeed rich, but not overly so. The number of concepts you need to learn is comparable to (modern) Python or less. Ra

Not my experience with it: the language is indeed rich, but not overly so. The number of concepts you need to learn is comparable to (modern) Python or less. Raku is also very consistent, choosing to apply already existing concepts rather than invent a new one (when designers are forced to choose) most of the time. While you still have many ways of accomplishing each task, no language elements are dedicated to a single task. As for operators - most of them are simply aliases for method names, you don't have to use them. However, some operators are representations of concepts that are not available through other means (e.g., `...`[1], circumfix `[]`, infix `Z`) The page you linked to makes no distinction and dumps everything that is syntactically an operator on a single page, resulting in a very long list. In practice, you don't need to remember more than a small fraction of them. [1] https://docs.raku.org/language/operators#infix_%2E%2E%2E https://docs.raku.org/language/operators#infix_%2E%2E%2E