4 ms·
A,B) yeah thats actually unfortunate with 23, but shouldn't be a problem in the future. C,D) The current naming scheme is RVAxx where xx is increased for every
by camel-cdr 2y ago
A,B) yeah thats actually unfortunate with 23, but shouldn't be a problem in the future.
C,D) The current naming scheme is RVAxx where xx is increased for every major profile update, one that adds new mandatory extensions. Minor releases are RVAxx.y (iirc) which don't change mandated features but may allow more optional extension. The profiles are supposed to be backwards compatible, and will have a slow release cadence. The increment isn't fixed, but it's still unlikely we'll run out of two digit names. Regardless, if we ever are at RVA70, it's trivial to preserve ordering by going to something like RVA710 next.