3 ms·
Or it might be the necessary logical consequence of having anything at all.
by layer8 2y ago
Or it might be the necessary logical consequence of having anything at all.
- AlecSchueler 2y agoI've always thought of it more as the logical consequence of having nothing, the need for there to be a something to oppose it.
- alok-g 2y agoWhen they applied Heisenberg principle to vacuum to bring up zero point energy, Casimir force was found, etc., I understood thtis as the principle opposing nothingness.