3 ms·
I agree, this is abysmal ux. Doesn't even remotely work on my phone. All those stupid animations literally removing information from my screen before I've had a
by wholinator2 2y ago
I agree, this is abysmal ux. Doesn't even remotely work on my phone. All those stupid animations literally removing information from my screen before I've had a chance to read it. Drastically reducing the "reading surface" of the actual information attempting to be conveyed. Animations are cool and useful but they too could just be placed on a static page.
The whole thing seems like some over excited marketing person enshittifying the literal idea of static pages of informative just to make something "new".
- JohnMakin 2y agoI forget which publication, might have been the new yorker, won a pulitzer prize for a long-form article written in this style. Visually it worked very well (because it was telling a story, not trying to convey information) and the scrolling graphic transitions were gentle enough that I could manage it + reader mode. Since then, it seems like other magazines have followed suit.