3 ms·
Hopefully it's decent. This generation has been terrible for AMD and Intel. Both have been basically identical in performance to the previous gen. If that's tr
by Night_Thastus 2y ago
Hopefully it's decent. This generation has been terrible for AMD and Intel. Both have been basically identical in performance to the previous gen.
If that's true from 7800X3D -> 9800X3D too it'll suck.
- bryanlarsen 2y agoWasn't that mostly due to Windows, which has since been fixed?
- Night_Thastus 2y agoNo. The Windows patch bumped up both Ryzen 4th and 5th generation identically. Their performance delta remained the same.
- jauntywundrkind 2y agohttps://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/the-zen-5-gaming-postmortem-larger-generational-gains-than-many-reported-game-boosting-windows-update-tested-ryzen-5-7600x3d-gaming-benchmarks-too https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/the-zen-5-ga... looks pretty good to me, for everyday & gaming workloads. The avx512 is a monster, if you can use it. Power efficiency & scaling is also very nicely improved. Intel's Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake aren't monster desktop cores but they bring Intel from way way way behind in power efficiency to pretty good. And the new iGPU is far better than anyone expected, and their drivers team just dropped another huge performance win last week. I'm very impressed. AMD's server lineup is much more full top to bottom this time around too, and the cores & their io are absolutely well epic (epic joke).