3 ms·
Well I guess the theory is that you could go to court, and the court would be reasonable and say "this 1 second look does not fulfill the requirement, you need
by lucianbr 2y ago
Well I guess the theory is that you could go to court, and the court would be reasonable and say "this 1 second look does not fulfill the requirement, you need to actually use human judgement and see what was going on there". Lots of discussions regarding FAANG malicious compliance have shown this is how high courts work in EU. When there is political will.
But if you're a nobody, and can't afford to go to court against Deutsche Bank for example, of course you're SOL. EU has some good parts, but it's still a human government.
It's especially problematic since a good chunk of those "flagged" are actually doing something nefarious, and both courts and government will consider that "mostly works" is a good outcome. One or ten unlucky citizens are just the way the world works, as long as it's not someone with money or power or fame.
- auggierose 2y agoI don't see that even people with money and power can do anything here. It is like VAR. When has it ever happened that the referee goes to the screen, and does not follow the VAR recommendation? Never. That is how automated decision making will work as well, across the board.