3 ms·

Meanwhile, a terrorist on US soil has openly threatened [1] to blow up Air India flights again [1] with specific dates. That doesn't qualify under free speech p

Meanwhile, a terrorist on US soil has openly threatened [1] to blow up Air India flights again [1] with specific dates. That doesn't qualify under free speech protections, does it? He's a US and Canadian dual citizen, the US government has been trying to protect him by giving him intelligence about threats against him, in Canada the CBC has been interviewing him and he said he's in regular touch with Trudeau. Very strange just like the 1984 bombing of Air India that took off from Canada by the same Khalistan terrorists, killing 350 people of Indian origin including about 80 children. The investigation in Canada was completely botched and let the terrorists go free. [1] https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/khalistani-terrorist-gurpatwant-singh-pannun-issues-threat-against-air-india-flights-here-s-what-passengers-need-to-know/ar-AA1sEPDg https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/khalistani-terrorist-gu... [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hk_L3rqYCw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hk_L3rqYCw

chasil 2y ago
The current test for freedom of speech in the U.S. is "Imminent Lawless Action," which is a refinement of the previous "Clear and Present Danger" standard. The threats do not qualify under the current test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
somedude871 2y ago
[dead]
satnam14 2y ago
This is fake news with fake videos in the linked articles. This person has not threatened anyone. Instead he's been a vocal figure about the political crimes committed against a minority by the Indian government. The Indian government tried to assassinate him but got caught red handed. And now their media is trying to convince everyone that this guy is a terrorist. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/22/india-us-sikh-assassination/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/22/...
geodel 2y ago
Good that guy is not in India, Otherwise he would be put behind bars for decades or just executed/hanged or encountered without any consequence whatsoever. No burden of proof on government ever. It seems to me this government is watching too many Akshay Kumar movies and thinking they can get away with eliminating "threats" on foreign soil and be called heroes for doing this.

chasil 2y ago

The current test for freedom of speech in the U.S. is "Imminent Lawless Action," which is a refinement of the previous "Clear and Present Danger" standard. The threats do not qualify under the current test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]

somedude871 2y ago

[dead]

satnam14 2y ago

This is fake news with fake videos in the linked articles. This person has not threatened anyone. Instead he's been a vocal figure about the political crimes committed against a minority by the Indian government. The Indian government tried to assassinate him but got caught red handed. And now their media is trying to convince everyone that this guy is a terrorist. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/22/india-us-sikh-assassination/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/22/...

geodel 2y ago

Good that guy is not in India, Otherwise he would be put behind bars for decades or just executed/hanged or encountered without any consequence whatsoever. No burden of proof on government ever. It seems to me this government is watching too many Akshay Kumar movies and thinking they can get away with eliminating "threats" on foreign soil and be called heroes for doing this.